Page 1 of 1
Topic revievin'
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2003 10:57 am
by 486 player
What's the matter?! Why we can't post into old topic, if we've a reason (new opinnioon, something to add, etc)? Or dost you want to start a new topic that restarts or continues locked's business? It makes no sense!
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2003 2:05 pm
by Dogbreath
? You *can* post in old topics, so long as you have a good point. The problem is, many people *cough*Wally4000*cough* just post to say "lol! This toipcc iz old!!!1!!!1!!!!111!!!" and do nothing but clutter up the board with it. Don't feel as if all revives are bad, though.
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2003 2:12 pm
by 486 player
So K0 made a bad thing to KeenGuy. Not all revieve posts were like thou wrote.
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2003 2:38 pm
by Dogbreath
Say that again with proper sentence structure, grammer and modern English, sir. I don't get what you were saying.
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2003 2:44 pm
by 486 player
Not all revieve posts were spams.
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 9:20 am
by Kazer0
Hes saying "Yar, k0 is a scurvey pirate for locking of old post with unuseful comment added, argh!"
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2003 1:15 pm
by Dogbreath
Ay, of course they aren't, are there are some revived topics that aren't locked (the ones revived for a useful purpose)-only the spam ones are. (shesh, reasoning with an 11-year-old can be so frustrating...)
In any case, if you have a complaint again K0, PM me with the reason and a link to the topic.
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2003 10:15 am
by 486 player
KG's comparation was ok. It wasn't off-topic. If anyone else wants to review House, (s)he must astart new topic.
(So unlock it.)
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2003 1:40 pm
by Kazer0
You only need to review something once. If everyone wrote a review about everything, there would be no point of reviews.
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2003 2:07 pm
by 486 player
I disagree. Ok, only 1 would be added to main site, but if someone has different opinnion, (s)he should have right to post his/her review.
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2003 2:16 pm
by Kazer0
Well then another topic would be appropriate, not ruining someone elses.
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2003 2:26 pm
by 486 player
It's NOT ruinin'! It's a different opinion!
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2003 6:49 pm
by Splodginator
486 player wrote:KG's comparation was ok. It wasn't off-topic. If anyone else wants to review House, (s)he must astart new topic.
(So unlock it.)
I'd hardly call:
I love Hugo's House of Horrors. Its catchy. Only one problem, I Really Don't like the Dos version! You can Download HHH For Windows Free! (Not that i dislike dos! ) The Windows version has way better Graphics an has MIDI Throuou the entire game. The Areas are exactly the same and it runs in a window And has mouse dpaintand click interface! But its not any different that affects gameplay. Runs Smoother too. But my final conclusion: DOS version- 6/10 Win Version- 9/10
Do some googleing to find it! (2 and 3 for windows ya have to pay though)
A review. Its more an off-topic/General DOS Games subject.
ha
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2003 2:52 am
by Wally
Well i dont all the time..
Compliments to Dogbreath
