Shoetaquilla's Avatar, or Women - Sex Objects or not?

nastypoisonspikes · Post by **nastypoisonspikes** » Thu Nov 13, 2003 2:46 am

LOVE the avatar.

SHOETAQUILLA · Post by **SHOETAQUILLA** » Thu Nov 13, 2003 2:54 am

Thats my Girlfriend

Nobody looks at my girl like that!!!! :Angry:

Check-Mate · Post by **Check-Mate** » Fri Nov 14, 2003 6:57 pm

nastypoisonspikes wrote:LOVE the avatar.

Ew! Exploitation and discrimination against women! WHERE ARE THE RIGHTS! :Angry:

Post by **Dogbreath** » Fri Nov 14, 2003 7:45 pm

"Shush shush shush.....not now...i'm making (bum bum bum) TOAST!!"

And what is this "bum toast" you speak of? Come now, if you're going to attack NPS let's talk about your perversions first, missy. :Angry:

Check-Mate · Post by **Check-Mate** » Fri Nov 14, 2003 8:09 pm

Dogbreath wrote:
"Shush shush shush.....not now...i'm making (bum bum bum) TOAST!!"
And what is this "bum toast" you speak of? Come now, if you're going to attack NPS let's talk about your perversions first, missy. :Angry:

Excuse me? The "bum bum bum" are sound effects! AND it's from a CHILDREN'S cartoon....
Plus, it isn't NPS...its "SHOETAQUILLA"

Post by **Dogbreath** » Fri Nov 14, 2003 8:31 pm

Excuse me? The "bum bum bum" are sound effects!

Oh God, not even *I'm* that sick... *starts up the "Uncle Fucker" sound from Southpark*

Kazer0 · Post by **Kazer0** » Fri Nov 14, 2003 11:04 pm

*Blame Canada*

johpower · Post by **johpower** » Sat Nov 15, 2003 9:46 pm

The only bum toast I know of is in Rocky Horror Picture Show! "A toast!" (cover your heads) "Meatloaf again?!" (cover your heads) "EEEDDDDDIIIIIEEEEEE!!!! (cover your ears).

SHOETAQUILLA · Post by **SHOETAQUILLA** » Thu Nov 27, 2003 5:07 am

*Check-Mate* wrote: Ew! Exploitation and discrimination against women! WHERE ARE THE RIGHTS!

*Check-Mate*:
If you had a picture of a hunk as your avatar I would say the same thing!!
but just to be on safe terms with you i'm not trying to exploit women with my avatar as to me it's animation!!

Post by **wardrich** » Thu Nov 27, 2003 4:43 pm

and very well animated too! Did you make it yourself? It's complexity is amazing!

-Richard-

Post by **Wally** » Thu Nov 27, 2003 7:47 pm

funny you know wardrich...

You probably will want some of those bouncy things for christmas

!!!!

Post by **wardrich** » Thu Nov 27, 2003 9:41 pm

what do you mean that it's funny i know? The base model is really good, and the complexity to make the animation so smooth, and the number of redraws in the chest and arms would be amazing, but especially the chest b/c of the shading and such.

-Richard-

Check-Mate · Post by **Check-Mate** » Fri Nov 28, 2003 10:50 pm

wardrich wrote:what do you mean that it's funny i know? The base model is really good, and the complexity to make the animation so smooth, and the number of redraws in the chest and arms would be amazing, but especially the chest b/c of the shading and such.

-Richard-

Just makes you want to look at it all day

*Check-Mate*:
If you had a picture of a hunk as your avatar I would say the same thing!!
but just to be on safe terms with you i'm not trying to exploit women with my avatar as to me it's animation!!

Oh wow. I can't even believe you said ANY of that! First off....I'm not that sick minded, second off, it's not like MZ or ANYONE else would let me have a avatar of say, a penis.
Third of all....if it's all the same to you about animation...find something else. :Angry:

Sasha WILL whip your ass, I NEVER lose an argument.

Post by **Dogbreath** » Sat Nov 29, 2003 2:11 pm

it's not like MZ or ANYONE else would let me have a avatar of say, a penis.

8==D~~~~ (Smiley in a chef hat drooling-of course

) And while we wouldn't allow you to have an exposed penis, those boobies aren't exposed either. (in that: Their nips ain't showing...) We'd allow a bouncy man-thong if you really wanted one...

Check-Mate · Post by **Check-Mate** » Sat Nov 29, 2003 5:43 pm

That's disgusting. It's not like they're covered very well.....very little left for the imagination. :Angry:
Yuck. It's like child Porn. You people KNOW there are children on this site.

Post by **Dogbreath** » Sat Nov 29, 2003 6:39 pm

No, the lady in the avatar is obviously not a child.

Check-Mate · Post by **Check-Mate** » Sat Nov 29, 2003 8:11 pm

Dogbreath wrote:No, the lady in the avatar is obviously not a child.

That's not what I meant. I meant that it's like porno for little kids.

denrix · Post by **denrix** » Sat Nov 29, 2003 9:23 pm

heh. "porn for little kids". it just gave me the idea of something weird. "Playbaby", featuring centerfolds of bare-breasted pregnant momies. THAT would be porn for little kids.

johpower · Post by **johpower** » Tue Dec 02, 2003 4:10 am

I notice that Chk-M8 has decided to touche' the SHOETAQUILLA
avatar. MMMMMOOOOOOOOO!!!

Post by **Dogbreath** » Tue Dec 02, 2003 8:53 am

Those are a bit big for cows...