What's the fastest video card for DOS games?

Want to talk about your hardware setup? Brag about your super-machine's layout? Pretend you know a lot about computers? You can do all that and more in this forum.
Post Reply
fabiobol
Experienced Member
Experienced Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 8:13 am

What's the fastest video card for DOS games?

Post by fabiobol »

At the moment, I'm using an Intel 486 DX-4/100, with 40 MB RAM, 2 GB WD HDD, Sound Blaster AWE32 (very, very long!), 56K modem and a Cirrus Logic GD 5428 Vesa video Card (1 MB ). Duke Nukem 3d, using a better resolution than 320x200, runs quite slow. Big Red Racing, also, runs at very few frames per second. My question is: what video card should I choose to use these games very well? My motherboard is a Aopen Vi15G with SiS 471 chipset, and doesn't support any PCI at all. So I must choose a VESA card.

At home, I also have other video cards:

-Tseng ET4000 ISA 1 MB: good, but does not support over 256 colours

-Trident Super VGA 1 MB ISA: rather slow, doesn't support over 256 colours

-Realtek 256 KB of memory ISA: very slow.

What can I do?
Last edited by fabiobol on Sun May 21, 2006 3:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Unknown_K
Way too much free time
Way too much free time
Posts: 559
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 6:55 pm

Post by Unknown_K »

Tseng ET4000 based VLB cards should do well in DOS games, most other accelerators were designed for Windows performance.
fabiobol
Experienced Member
Experienced Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 8:13 am

Post by fabiobol »

In your opinion, is there any way to make Big Red Racing work on my DX-4?
User avatar
Frenkel
Way too much free time
Way too much free time
Posts: 541
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 7:47 am
Location: Netherlands

Post by Frenkel »

FPS per second
That's funny :).
Groeten van Frenkel
Visit us at the Official S&F Prod. Homepage
fabiobol
Experienced Member
Experienced Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 8:13 am

Post by fabiobol »

Try to understand me: I'm italian, my English is not as good as I wanted... I'm sorry. I edit the message.
User avatar
dr_st
Way too much free time
Way too much free time
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 2:49 pm
Location: Absorbed into Clayface

Post by dr_st »

I think that on a 486, the CPU will bottleneck more than the video card.
fabiobol
Experienced Member
Experienced Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 8:13 am

Post by fabiobol »

I tried with a PCI-Motherboard an I put inside a Matrox Millennium PCI with 4 MB of memory... the results were better, but Big Red Racing was still very slow. Then I tried with a S3 Trio 64V+ with 2 MB and the games ran quite well but, again, Big Red Racing was quite slow. The minimum requirements say: 486DX2/66 MHz CPU; 8 MB RAM, 512 K video card (VGA). I have a system much better: 486DX4/100 MHz; 32 MB RAM; 2 MB video Card... but some games don't run well.
If I put a Matrox G200 PCI? How does it work in 2-d?
User avatar
KAN
Experienced Member
Experienced Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:13 pm
Location: Indonesia

Post by KAN »

dr_st wrote:I think that on a 486, the CPU will bottleneck more than the video card.
True. For high-res, texture mapped DOS games like Jane's ATF, Privateer 2, or Duke Nukem 3D (in high res), CPU matters more than video card.

It's better for you to replace your motherboard and CPU into an Intel 400BX and Pentium III. An 440BX motherboard still has at least an ISA slot, so you can still put your ISA soundcard (like SB AWE32) on it, thus, getting sound when booting in pure DOS. If you have such configuration, video card won't matter anymore to play DOS games.
wadeo999
Expert
Expert
Posts: 104
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:50 am
Location: Australia

as

Post by wadeo999 »

I use the 3DLABS Permedia 8mb card its really good for dos games.
Post Reply