| Author |
Message |
The_Sinister_Mastermind
Overlord
Joined: 26 Oct 2005
Posts: 2757
Location: NSW, Australia, Down Under Verse
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:24 am
Post subject: |
 |
|
| Trust me, the old processor in that machine was FAR better then the current one, the processors were not at all identical in the slightest. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Final Chance
Expert
Joined: 23 Dec 2006
Posts: 155
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 2:50 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| They might have given you a Klamath Pentium 2 with a 66 MHz bus, which is also compatible with Slot 1. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The_Sinister_Mastermind
Overlord
Joined: 26 Oct 2005
Posts: 2757
Location: NSW, Australia, Down Under Verse
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 8:22 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
Honestly I wouldn't have a clue I haven't the slightest idea what the old part was and there's no way to find out now, I don't use that computer much anymore now anyway, not since I found the XP patch for X-Com.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
abyss
Moloral Compass
Joined: 06 Nov 2006
Posts: 714
Location: A city known for mining. sudbury
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Larry Laffer
Moderator
Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 3294
Location: Romania
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 5:13 am
Post subject: |
|
|
XP patch for X-COM? I never heard of it. However, I DID get X-COM E.U. "Gold Edition" and the program is for Win. and it works flawlessly on XP!
Also... Abyss, you KNOW that that video bashes win 95 right?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
