| How old are you? |
| under 15 |
|
9% |
[ 2 ] |
| between 16 and 25 |
|
81% |
[ 18 ] |
| between 26 and 35 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| between 36 and 50 |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
| between 51 and 100 |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
| over 100(still kicking around here) |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 22 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Vangar
Expert
Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 177
Location: NSW, Australia
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:19 am
Post subject: |
 |
|
I'm 16, 17 soon. As for 3D games being better then 2D/DOS games... well personally i don't think you should try to compare these as a single topic. The games from the past were created to time jumps and collect bonuses for points, the games now are to project realism and stunning details. You can't compare something like this, they are to remain seperate and be enjoyed equally.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HappyHarvick29
Experienced Member
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 78
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 3:07 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| Vangar wrote: | | I'm 16, 17 soon. As for 3D games being better then 2D/DOS games... well personally i don't think you should try to compare these as a single topic. The games from the past were created to time jumps and collect bonuses for points, the games now are to project realism and stunning details. You can't compare something like this, they are to remain seperate and be enjoyed equally. |
Hmm, very good point. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Larry Laffer
Admin
Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 3925
Location: Romania
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2006 6:11 am
Post subject: |
|
|
| So the bottom line is that old games(non-text-based old games) are great |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
