| Author |
Message |
GameMaster.EXE Way too much free time

 Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 705 Location: North Texas, USA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 5:33 pm
Post subject: Getting a Win2000 |
|
|
Sometime tomorrow I'm gonna go out and get this machine running Win2k for sale. It's not gonna be perfect, but wayyyyyy better then my Win95 I'm using to post this right now. My plans will be to do my everyday work on my Win2k and play my dos games on my Win95, if I can't get DOSbox to play a game as smoothly as possible. Just wanting to inform everybody.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kazer0 Mercenary Dishwasher
 Joined: 17 Sep 2002 Posts: 2720 Location: In an igloo with my pet penguin, eh?
|
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 11:55 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| Windows 2000 is the best. Period. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dr_st Lord of Gaming

 Joined: 23 Jun 2004 Posts: 309 Location: Absorbed into Clayface
|
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 11:26 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| Kazer0 wrote: | | Windows 2000 is the best. Period. |
I disagree. Period. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kazer0 Mercenary Dishwasher
 Joined: 17 Sep 2002 Posts: 2720 Location: In an igloo with my pet penguin, eh?
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 12:46 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
You would, and so would many people.
Having used every Windows OS since 3.1, I would definately say that Windows 2000 was the best overall. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wally i r teh pwnage
 Joined: 01 May 2003 Posts: 4031 Location: Australia, earth, Milky way
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 12:50 am
Post subject: |
|
|
The best windows is errr... Windows 0.0
Because it wasnt released yet |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dr_st Lord of Gaming

 Joined: 23 Jun 2004 Posts: 309 Location: Absorbed into Clayface
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 2:53 am
Post subject: |
|
|
| Kazer0 wrote: | You would, and so would many people.
Having used every Windows OS since 3.1, I would definately say that Windows 2000 was the best overall. |
You think I haven't used them all?
You're right. I haven't used Windows Millennium. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kazer0 Mercenary Dishwasher
 Joined: 17 Sep 2002 Posts: 2720 Location: In an igloo with my pet penguin, eh?
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 7:38 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| dr_st wrote: | | Kazer0 wrote: | You would, and so would many people.
Having used every Windows OS since 3.1, I would definately say that Windows 2000 was the best overall. |
You think I haven't used them all?
You're right. I haven't used Windows Millennium. |
I was explaining how it was my personal opinion, and how for what I use it for, Windows 2000 is the best.
And Wally, are you naturally dumb or do you just act dumb to see how much you get flamed? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wally i r teh pwnage
 Joined: 01 May 2003 Posts: 4031 Location: Australia, earth, Milky way
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 2:13 am
Post subject: |
|
|
Dr_st: lets keep it that way Unless you are willing to get flooded with error messages. I havent either so.
Kazer0: thats just a point i made besides windows 0.0 can be called DOS as well  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dosraider Moderator

 Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 6797 Location: ROTFLMAO in Belgium.
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 9:19 am
Post subject: |
|
|
Are you feeling well Wally ?
Calling DOS "WINDOWS 0.0????
WTF has DOS common with windows ?
The only "window" you got on dos was dosshell, or third party as norton comander and others.
Djees, restrain yourself, your windows hate is going out of reasonability.
And the greatest joke is that all mac's can run dos/windows, hell mac "die hards" even pay for extra addon card to been able to run that OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooo so bad OS. You are nuts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GameMaster.EXE Way too much free time

 Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 705 Location: North Texas, USA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 5:20 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
This is the second time I start a simple topic but it turns into a Hey-Everybody-Let's-Flame-Wally outburst. Not that I oppose it ( )
Maybe I should do this more often...........  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dosraider Moderator

 Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 6797 Location: ROTFLMAO in Belgium.
|
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 6:00 am
Post subject: |
|
|
I don't agree with you gamemaster.exe, you d'better say:
Wally everytime jumps in telling everybody what suckers we are using an inferior OS compared to his superior MAC
(who NEVER needs update's,NEVER has any security updates, NEVER has any compability problems,NEVER has any problems fitting older hardware on newer MAC compy's and ALL are able to run an idiotic OS as DOS or Windows.....In fact when a MACidiot wants to show you his newest toy the first thing the nutcase say is :AND I CAN RUN WINDOWS ON IT yes, even ower Wally runs it on his MAC, i never met one pc adept who wants to run ANY mac OS on his pc...).
About your W2K: get it well installed as it should be, don't overload it with all kinds of jinglebells who are useless anyway,and you will have a steady PC. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kazer0 Mercenary Dishwasher
 Joined: 17 Sep 2002 Posts: 2720 Location: In an igloo with my pet penguin, eh?
|
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 8:08 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| Acxtually, I plan on trying MAC OSX x86 when it comes out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dosraider Moderator

 Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 6797 Location: ROTFLMAO in Belgium.
|
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 3:42 am
Post subject: |
|
|
Hehe, MacTel.....maybe it will not fry the intel proc as the 'perfect' G5.....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wally i r teh pwnage
 Joined: 01 May 2003 Posts: 4031 Location: Australia, earth, Milky way
|
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 6:21 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
Err dosraider: some of the older machines came with doscards.
Kazer0: Apparently my friend has already got a hacked version there but wont run anything below Os X. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dosraider Moderator

 Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 6797 Location: ROTFLMAO in Belgium.
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 4:13 am
Post subject: |
|
|
I think you get my point Wally,
Evenso: no hard feelings........  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|