AMD Opteron/64FX and Intel Itanium
AMD Opteron/64FX and Intel Itanium
Hmmm... 64-bit CPUs are on the horizon for normal computing. I've read stuff about them and this is what I observe.
Intel Itanium has a brand-new instruction set.
AMD 64-bit uses the 386 instruction set from 1985.
Errrrr.... A 386 on steroids (AMD) or the NEXT GENERATION (Intel)!!!
(Of course, aside from stuff like math chips, MMX, SSE, SSE2, etc. a Pentium 4 is just a super duper 386. It seems to me that AMD only intends to carry on a 19-year old tradition while Intel is doing stuff from scratch.)
Is the AMD 64-bit (Opteron, 64FX, or whatever ya call it) merely a 'Pentium 5'? Or can it go head-to-head against Itanium?
If Intel makes a Baby Itanium for desktop PCs, would it leave AMD behind in the dust?
Intel Itanium has a brand-new instruction set.
AMD 64-bit uses the 386 instruction set from 1985.
Errrrr.... A 386 on steroids (AMD) or the NEXT GENERATION (Intel)!!!
(Of course, aside from stuff like math chips, MMX, SSE, SSE2, etc. a Pentium 4 is just a super duper 386. It seems to me that AMD only intends to carry on a 19-year old tradition while Intel is doing stuff from scratch.)
Is the AMD 64-bit (Opteron, 64FX, or whatever ya call it) merely a 'Pentium 5'? Or can it go head-to-head against Itanium?
If Intel makes a Baby Itanium for desktop PCs, would it leave AMD behind in the dust?
- Kazer0
- <i>Mercenary Dishwasher</i>
- Posts: 2704
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 5:46 pm
- Location: In an igloo with my pet penguin, eh?
Nope. Your wrong. AMD knows exactly what to do. If this is true, AMD is about to smoke Intel. Intels 64bit processor is going to take years to finish. And with a 32bit 3.4-3.6ghz limit, AMD's ghetto 64bit chip will be the fastest avalible for years, with the p4 limited at 3.4ghz the only option for intel. While making huge profits off the 64bit processor, they can develop a new form of processor and release that.
All in the marketing my friend.
All in the marketing my friend.
Yeah, I suppose 32-bit has a few years of popularity remaining (since Windows Longhorn, 32-bit, is coming out in a year or so). I guess AMD made a wise choice in sticking with 1985 technology since it seems to have a bit more time to live.
And for Intel to make Itaniums for the average middle-class family, they've got a BIG JOB ahead of them. Inventing something is one thing. Making it cheap enough for the general public is another.
Even if Intel released the cheap Baby Itanium tomorrow, the software needs a lot of time to catch up with the IA-64 instruction set. And 32-bit emulation is slower than a Pentium 4! There's already Windows XP 64-bit edition for Itanium, now we need some 64-bit software to go with it...
And for Intel to make Itaniums for the average middle-class family, they've got a BIG JOB ahead of them. Inventing something is one thing. Making it cheap enough for the general public is another.
Even if Intel released the cheap Baby Itanium tomorrow, the software needs a lot of time to catch up with the IA-64 instruction set. And 32-bit emulation is slower than a Pentium 4! There's already Windows XP 64-bit edition for Itanium, now we need some 64-bit software to go with it...
- johpower
- Way too much free time
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 6:59 pm
- Location: Colorado North 40
I have a feeling the AMD chip is subtly aimed at the open-source Linux-Unix desktop crowd. They are looking at the non-MS market and figuring their chip will be directly compatable, while the Intel may not (or Intel will require a different/difficult compilation). Very smart move if their guess of a 10% Linux share of the home OS market by 2006-7 comes true. I certainly hope their stock does well.
Sig: "The Universe is change... but it is not exact change." -Fusco Bros.
Conditions apply though: pOstage and handling but yeah
should be the right link
http://www.windows-help.net/WindowsXP/w ... trial.html
Have fun!
should be the right link
http://www.windows-help.net/WindowsXP/w ... trial.html
Have fun!