| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 9:12 pm
Post subject: Hard Drive RPM |
|
|
| If I went from 5200 RPM to 10400 RPM, would my hard drive be twice as fast? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kazer0 Mercenary Dishwasher
 Joined: 17 Sep 2002 Posts: 2720 Location: In an igloo with my pet penguin, eh?
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 9:51 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| In some ways, yes. But how much did a 10,000 RPM HD cost you? My 40gb 7200 RPM cost me $100 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:08 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| I didn't buy one, I just saw one on the IBM web site. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kazer0 Mercenary Dishwasher
 Joined: 17 Sep 2002 Posts: 2720 Location: In an igloo with my pet penguin, eh?
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 4:20 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| Ah, well don't bother with 10k RPM. Modern drives are 7200 and run just fine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 4:46 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah, with all the bottlenecks like parts of the motherboard, the IDE interface, and other stuff, even a 1,000,000 RPM hard drive may not help much (if they existed). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wardrich lawl catz r lawlz

 Joined: 14 Sep 2002 Posts: 3086 Location: Ontario Canada
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 5:54 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
AFAIK, the ONLY 10K RPM HDD is Western Digital's Raptor drive, and they are EXPENSIVE.
-Richard- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:01 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| Is the Raptor IDE or SCSI? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wardrich lawl catz r lawlz

 Joined: 14 Sep 2002 Posts: 3086 Location: Ontario Canada
|
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2004 11:02 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| I think it's IDE. The speed is hardly noticable though. You might as well stick to the standard 7500. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johpower Way too much free time

 Joined: 06 Jan 2003 Posts: 424 Location: Colorado North 40
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2004 10:29 am
Post subject: |
|
|
All things being equal, the main place you experience increase is at the read/write heads. There's alot of other sys overhead in the drive electronics and PC interface. The price goes up trying to get all these items to work well together at the higher speed. More drive cache, faster ATA, high tollerance drive motors, critical balancing, ad nausium can mean it doesn't come down to consumer level pricing for a while.
Connor (among others) had problems back in the 500-1200 mb range of drives in this vein. These drives (from most mfg's) were the worst made in the past decade (though some of it had to do with the "drive translation" ware to enable BIOS volumes above 63hds/1024cyls/16sides (512mb cap) of the era. Connor's, however, were esp bad, physically and electronically. I recall the ugly of hand swapping the drives and boards trying to get something to work for customers trying to save data. Too bad. I've had good luck with all their others. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|