Topic revievin'

486 player · Post by **486 player** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 10:57 am

What's the matter?! Why we can't post into old topic, if we've a reason (new opinnioon, something to add, etc)? Or dost you want to start a new topic that restarts or continues locked's business? It makes no sense!

Post by **Dogbreath** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 2:05 pm

? You *can* post in old topics, so long as you have a good point. The problem is, many people *cough*Wally4000*cough* just post to say "lol! This toipcc iz old!!!1!!!1!!!!111!!!" and do nothing but clutter up the board with it. Don't feel as if all revives are bad, though.

486 player · Post by **486 player** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 2:12 pm

So K0 made a bad thing to KeenGuy. Not all revieve posts were like thou wrote.

Post by **Dogbreath** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 2:38 pm

Say that again with proper sentence structure, grammer and modern English, sir. I don't get what you were saying.

486 player · Post by **486 player** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 2:44 pm

Not all revieve posts were spams.

Kazer0 · Post by **Kazer0** » Mon Sep 29, 2003 9:20 am

Hes saying "Yar, k0 is a scurvey pirate for locking of old post with unuseful comment added, argh!"

Post by **Dogbreath** » Mon Sep 29, 2003 1:15 pm

Ay, of course they aren't, are there are some revived topics that aren't locked (the ones revived for a useful purpose)-only the spam ones are. (shesh, reasoning with an 11-year-old can be so frustrating...)

In any case, if you have a complaint again K0, PM me with the reason and a link to the topic.

486 player · Post by **486 player** » Tue Sep 30, 2003 10:15 am

KG's comparation was ok. It wasn't off-topic. If anyone else wants to review House, (s)he must astart new topic.

(So unlock it.)

Kazer0 · Post by **Kazer0** » Tue Sep 30, 2003 1:40 pm

You only need to review something once. If everyone wrote a review about everything, there would be no point of reviews.

486 player · Post by **486 player** » Tue Sep 30, 2003 2:07 pm

I disagree. Ok, only 1 would be added to main site, but if someone has different opinnion, (s)he should have right to post his/her review.

Kazer0 · Post by **Kazer0** » Tue Sep 30, 2003 2:16 pm

Well then another topic would be appropriate, not ruining someone elses.

486 player · Post by **486 player** » Tue Sep 30, 2003 2:26 pm

It's NOT ruinin'! It's a different opinion!

Splodginator · Post by **Splodginator** » Tue Sep 30, 2003 6:49 pm

486 player wrote:KG's comparation was ok. It wasn't off-topic. If anyone else wants to review House, (s)he must astart new topic. (So unlock it.)

I'd hardly call:

I love Hugo's House of Horrors. Its catchy. Only one problem, I Really Don't like the Dos version! You can Download HHH For Windows Free! (Not that i dislike dos! ) The Windows version has way better Graphics an has MIDI Throuou the entire game. The Areas are exactly the same and it runs in a window And has mouse dpaintand click interface! But its not any different that affects gameplay. Runs Smoother too. But my final conclusion: DOS version- 6/10 Win Version- 9/10

Do some googleing to find it! (2 and 3 for windows ya have to pay though)

A review. Its more an off-topic/General DOS Games subject.

Post by **Wally** » Sat Oct 04, 2003 2:52 am

Well i dont all the time..

Compliments to Dogbreath