| Author |
Message |
Larry Laffer
Moderator
Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 3191
Location: Romania
|
 Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:43 am
Post subject: |
 |
|
| Shuddup you, I was talking to Tinman :evil: |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dosraider
Moderator
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 4220
Location: ROTFLMAO in Belgium.
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:49 am
Post subject: |
|
|
| tinman47 wrote: |
RAM: 1982 MB
|
How you come to that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Larry Laffer
Moderator
Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 3191
Location: Romania
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 3:00 am
Post subject: |
|
|
1024+512+256=1892
Maybe it was a typo?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dosraider
Moderator
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 4220
Location: ROTFLMAO in Belgium.
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 3:32 am
Post subject: |
|
|
An extra 256MB on a AMD Turion64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52 ?
OMG.
Now yeah, maybe he uses a USB stick as extra RAM.
*Edit
Maybe we should split those last posts into a 'TinMan47's weird memory lounge' topic in General.
LOLZ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Larry Laffer
Moderator
Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 3191
Location: Romania
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 4:13 am
Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, that'd be a great idea!
NOT!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wardrich
lawl catz r lawlz
Joined: 14 Sep 2002
Posts: 2942
Location: Ontario Canada
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 6:32 am
Post subject: |
|
|
| tinman47 wrote: | | Processor: AMD Turion64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52 (I have 2 of them.) |
So your computer has 4 processors? Isn't that a bit overkill? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
franpa
Way too much free time
Joined: 02 Jan 2006
Posts: 908
Location: australia, qld
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 6:47 am
Post subject: |
|
|
| means he has 2 processors each with 2 cores... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Larry Laffer
Moderator
Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 3191
Location: Romania
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 12:57 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| Mmm! Quad-core with XP 32x |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tinman47
Lord of Gaming
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 231
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:00 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| Its great,Ill send you my comp through mail. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wardrich
lawl catz r lawlz
Joined: 14 Sep 2002
Posts: 2942
Location: Ontario Canada
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 4:18 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| franpa wrote: | | means he has 2 processors each with 2 cores... |
Which would be like 4 processors |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
franpa
Way too much free time
Joined: 02 Jan 2006
Posts: 908
Location: australia, qld
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:47 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| yes but physicaly its only 2 processors each a dual core, neither is a quad core, larry used the term quad core wrongly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Larry Laffer
Moderator
Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 3191
Location: Romania
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 1:54 am
Post subject: |
|
|
2 processors, each dual core, that's quad core(remember, this is Tinman we're talking to) And yes, it's overkill!
This reminds me I gotta check out them prices on the quad-core persessors! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
franpa
Way too much free time
Joined: 02 Jan 2006
Posts: 908
Location: australia, qld
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:19 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| 2 dual cores does not equal a quad core (it does equal 4 cores tho) quad cores are inferior to dual core processors at single threaded programs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dosraider
Moderator
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 4220
Location: ROTFLMAO in Belgium.
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 6:44 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| franpa wrote: | | ..quad cores are inferior to dual core processors at single threaded programs. |
No Franpa, they are equal if compared to the same clockrate dual and single core procs.
They simply use one core if the software isn't developed with paralellism in mind.
When compared with single thread software to the newest single core systems they will be slower, but that's only because a new single proc system has a much higher clockrate.
Compare them with a single/dual core with the same clock rate and they win (a little).
When benchmarked they usually perform a small bit better, because they are mounted in the newest systems(mobos-fastest RAM, and so on...).
And if I'm wrong, it means I didn't understand what the IT minions from Nixdorf told me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
greencosmos
Expert
Joined: 13 Nov 2006
Posts: 115
Location: Finland
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:09 am
Post subject: |
|
|
| Let's see what I understand of this stuff... I have a Logitech laser mouse... Logitech speakers... Samtron screen... 114 GT hard disk... and Windows XP. Dunno about the others tuff. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
