| Is Abandonware Illegal? |
| Yes! |
|
50% |
[ 16 ] |
| No! |
|
40% |
[ 13 ] |
| I'm not sure... |
|
9% |
[ 3 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 32 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Cyber Ghost Member

 Joined: 09 Aug 2003 Posts: 39
|
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 11:53 am
Post subject: |Poll| Is Abandonware Illegal? |Poll| |
|
|
Post your answer and maybe some comments! Lemme know what the majority think! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
486 player Gaming Demi-god

 Joined: 18 Sep 2002 Posts: 1079
|
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 2:18 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| That's 3rd aw legalisize topic! Accordin' to law it's illegal but to fair not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dogbreath Admin

 Joined: 14 Sep 2002 Posts: 4439 Location: In the back of a jacked-up Ford.
|
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 3:21 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes, it's illegal, and a poll wouldn't change that. Or are you asking if it should be illegal? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cyber Ghost Member

 Joined: 09 Aug 2003 Posts: 39
|
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 4:44 pm
Post subject: Yes that is what I ment Dog breath |
|
|
| I'm sorry I ment Should it Be Illegal Or Not. I'm I opinion I think that it should be but other friends of mine think other wise. Though I'd get an second opinion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wardrich lawl catz r lawlz

 Joined: 14 Sep 2002 Posts: 3361 Location: Ontario Canada
|
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2004 1:59 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
it IS illegal, but it shouldn't be. The only people losing out are the fans that want to play the game(s) again. If the company no longer supports it, it should become public domain.
-Richard- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dr_st Lord of Gaming

 Joined: 23 Jun 2004 Posts: 309 Location: Absorbed into Clayface
|
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:55 am
Post subject: |
|
|
| Where the "Who cares?" option? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CloudCobain Experienced Member

 Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 96 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2004 9:02 am
Post subject: Re: Yes that is what I ment Dog breath |
|
|
| Cyber Ghost wrote: | | I'm sorry I ment Should it Be Illegal Or Not. |
Well that's annoying. I voted Yes, because it is. I don't really agree with that.
Last edited by CloudCobain on Sun Aug 08, 2004 10:24 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
486 player Gaming Demi-god

 Joined: 18 Sep 2002 Posts: 1079
|
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2004 1:00 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| In public domain, there are NO COPYRIGHTS! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CloudCobain Experienced Member

 Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 96 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2004 4:31 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| Doesn't copyright work in a way that means, you can't take copyrighted material and use it in a way that makes money for you or exposes it to the public? So uh, if you're just playing some abandonware, why should that be illegal? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ro@m Hamachi Guardian
 Joined: 29 Jun 2003 Posts: 1542 Location: Croatia
|
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:43 am
Post subject: |
|
|
| no no and no,it IS illegal! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CloudCobain Experienced Member

 Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 96 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2004 10:25 am
Post subject: |
|
|
| Hey, I never said it wasn't. I was just trying to make sense of it. Don't bite my head off. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dopefish Way too much free time

 Joined: 29 Aug 2003 Posts: 371 Location: West Hartford, CT
|
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2004 10:58 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
My only solid view on copyright laws is that as soon as the artist/creator dies, the thing should become public domain. I hate the fact that Disney has bought courts to extend copyrights to last until 70 years after the artist dies.
Seriously, that's insane. With laws like that, Shakespeare wouldn't have been allowed to publish Romeo & Juliette (a rip-off of an Italian play). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Unknown_K Way too much free time

 Joined: 01 Oct 2002 Posts: 560
|
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:48 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| Dopefish wrote: | My only solid view on copyright laws is that as soon as the artist/creator dies, the thing should become public domain. I hate the fact that Disney has bought courts to extend copyrights to last until 70 years after the artist dies.
Seriously, that's insane. With laws like that, Shakespeare wouldn't have been allowed to publish Romeo & Juliette (a rip-off of an Italian play). |
I am all for having a limited time for copyrights from the day published (say 20 years), so you can milk a good work for a while. Romeo and Juliet was not an exact copy of the italian play, so copyright would not affect it would it? Copyright just protects the name of the original work and its contents (in whole or in parts) from reproduction. If you take Harry Potter change the characters names and traits plus the storyline a bit you can publish it with no problems. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
x86_Game-Junkie Lord of Gaming

 Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 321 Location: The Bachelor Pad, Sydney Oz
|
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 10:25 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
Depends on the perspective you are coming from, most hardware & software companies who create/develop games and other software, drivers and hardware actually have policies on their software/hardware. What I mean in lamans terms is some software/hardware is supported and on the other hand some are unsupported. It's normally to do with technical support issues, such as installations, error messages and conflicts etc etc!!
Abandonware to my knowledge isn't illegal, but unsupported by the vendor, distributor and software company.
Detailed definition Click Here |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Red Sun Newbie

 Joined: 18 Aug 2004 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 10:49 am
Post subject: |
|
|
| It shouldn't be illegal, in my opinion. The company isn't selling the game anymore, so you aren't taking anything away from the profits of the company by downloading it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|