DOS Games Message Board
DOS Games Discussion
A message board to talk about DOS games, get help, and find old games.
Do NOT post warez or abandonware requests please
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
NEW! DOSGames.com has been massively upgraded to v2.0 with TONS of new features!
Check out the new design and dozens of new features including online play!


The Perfect DOSgaming Machine?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DOS Games Discussion Forum Index -> Hardware
Author Message
Dogbreath
Admin
Admin


Offline
Joined: 14 Sep 2002
Posts: 4627
Location: In the back of a jacked-up Ford.

PostPosted: Sun May 02, 2004 1:47 am     Post subject: The Perfect DOSgaming Machine? Reply with quote

Today I had an interesting (if not somewhat insane and slightly stupid) idea: build a computer geared exclusively towards running DOS games. What I need to know is what is the ideal hardware (and software) for maximum compatibility? And where can I buy the parts in question?

Chances are this computer won't exist anywhere outside of my head (though I may build it this summer if I have any money left over from my car payments) but I still think it'd be fun to figure out what the ultimate DOS computer is-if only for the sake of someone else less lazy than I actually building it. Happy
Back to top
Unknown_K
Way too much free time
Way too much free time


Offline
Joined: 01 Oct 2002
Posts: 559

PostPosted: Sun May 02, 2004 4:52 am     Post subject: Reply with quote

I went down this road before and decided that there isn't one computer setup to play all the dos games. You have to remember the DOS game era stretched from the mid 80's all the way to the mid 90's and included many different processors, video cards, sound cards, etc.

So I ended up with a Tandy 1000 HX for the old CGA and Tandy games
A 386/40 for middle of the road DOS games, and a p200 for later era games. There are quite a few video and sound cards in the mix also.

You will find timing errors running real old games on newer machines (and the utils to fix this realy dont work), and without the correct soundcards the games seem flat to me.
Back to top
Interon
Guest






PostPosted: Sun May 02, 2004 12:21 pm     Post subject: Reply with quote

How about somewhere between a 386 DX and a 486 SX. RAM: no limit, minimum 2 MB.

Or perhaps a 486 DX2/50 with lots of RAM.

Think somewhere along those lines. Anything above a Pentium 100 is generally too fast. Also try to avoid AMD/clones and stick with Intel CPUs.

Or a 486 DX4/100 with a dandy turbo button.

Also my Pentium mobo has an option to turn off the cache. That allows it to run lots of old games.
Back to top
Robot_Maker
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 2:39 pm     Post subject: Reply with quote

I used to use a CX586 processor on an IBM Aptiva with 16MB ram, and that ran pretty much any dos game I threw at it, if this helps at all.

Been meaning to ask this for ages: What did the turbo button on 486 machines actually do?
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:02 pm     Post subject: Reply with quote

AFAIK, the turbo button made the computer run at about half-speed.
Back to top
Kazer0
Mercenary Dishwasher


Offline
Joined: 17 Sep 2002
Posts: 2704
Location: In an igloo with my pet penguin, eh?

PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 10:44 am     Post subject: Reply with quote

No, it made it run at full speed when pressed, 1/2 without it. Or, it might ave overclocked.
Back to top
486 player
Gaming Demi-god
Gaming Demi-god


Offline
Joined: 18 Sep 2002
Posts: 1183

PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 1:17 pm     Post subject: Reply with quote

Remember that?
Back to top
dr_st
Lord of Gaming
Lord of Gaming


Offline
Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 347
Location: Absorbed into Clayface

PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 7:50 pm     Post subject: Reply with quote

A P200.
Back to top
Jeff
Member
Member


Offline
Joined: 07 Aug 2003
Posts: 49

PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 8:11 pm     Post subject: Reply with quote

Any computer capable of running Windows 95 (but running dos) should be pretty good.

My Dos computer is a old Compaq 120MH Pentium, 16MB Ram, and 1.51GB HD running Dr. Dos 7.03. That's sufficient enough to run any Dos game that was made in the mid to late 80s and up. If anything, it needs more memory and hard drive space.
Back to top
Unknown_K
Way too much free time
Way too much free time


Offline
Joined: 01 Oct 2002
Posts: 559

PostPosted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 8:35 pm     Post subject: Reply with quote

Jeff wrote:
Any computer capable of running Windows 95 (but running dos) should be pretty good.

My Dos computer is a old Compaq 120MH Pentium, 16MB Ram, and 1.51GB HD running Dr. Dos 7.03. That's sufficient enough to run any Dos game that was made in the mid to late 80s and up. If anything, it needs more memory and hard drive space.


One machine will only satisfy a narrow range of DOS games. Speed can too slow for last generation games (Quake 1) or too fast for some old games (causing crashes). Each era has specific sets of hardware designed for those games (sound and video cards) to get the best experience out of them.
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 7:05 pm     Post subject: Reply with quote

Kazer0 wrote:
No, it made it run at full speed when pressed, 1/2 without it. Or, it might ave overclocked.


Oops, scrambled logic on my part.

My train of thought was focused on that the turbo button is on by default.
Back to top
hACman
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 3:47 pm     Post subject: Reply with quote

I like a computer with a voodoo 1 or 2 card and a Soundblaster AWE 64.(the last soundblaster card with Hardware sb16 support)
With at least 64MB Memmory. (dos can't manage more)
And then a mainbord the voodoo card works on.(not to new)
I am building one now. =)
Back to top
sirving
Guest






PostPosted: Sat Nov 06, 2004 8:42 pm     Post subject: experaince from he who still has his original dos machines Reply with quote

My experiance of the best dos machine would be

Asus motherboard
Pentium 133 or 200
Sound Blaster 16
96 megs ram(i had my system running that much with dos)
Ati mach 64 video card (more mem the better, 4megs i think was most you could get)
harddrive don't much matter
12x cdrom fast but not to fast

Also for those looking to build a dos machine, freedos is a great option to look at. Open source and free. Also for those looking for parts.
www.vfxweb.com
Back to top
Lostuser
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Nov 12, 2004 11:12 am     Post subject: Reply with quote

There are some good slowdown programs out there.

I've used slowdown.com..even in windows it works well. You just have to tinker with it to see its effects.
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:14 am     Post subject: hacking the gibson Reply with quote

I'm running a 486dx2 66 with 8 megs ram, soundblaster 16, 4x cd drive, and a nice old display adapter, capable of up to 1024x786x24 bit colour.

I call it, the gibson.

the system was built in 94ish, maybe 95

anyways, it runs all the dos games I could ever want, perfectly. Not only that, but because of some of the software soundblaster packaged with the card, I can listen to loud german heavy metal while killing nazi's in wolfenstein 3d.

I want to add another 8 megs ram, which I might have in another computer kicking around.

Anyways, I have a question.

Is it possible to ghetto-rig windows 95 on top of dos 6? or at least to make a frankendos by copying over some of the utilities offered in 6 that were dropped in 7?

rhonda_lonsdale@highlands.bc.ca
Back to top
Interon 2.0
Experienced Member
Experienced Member


Offline
Joined: 24 Sep 2004
Posts: 54

PostPosted: Fri Nov 19, 2004 2:40 pm     Post subject: Reply with quote

http://ansis.folklora.lv/dosver/dosvr251.zip

Try that to prevent the "Incorrect DOS version" error message when transferring DOS 6 files to a Windows 9x system.
Back to top
dokzero5
Member
Member


Offline
Joined: 10 Apr 2005
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 8:08 pm     Post subject: Reply with quote

The machine i build for dos games is a Pentium 200 MMX (slow enough to scale down and fast enough to play later DOS games) with a S3 Vision 864 card (2 mb) and a old SoundBlaster 16 with a Yamaha DB50-XG daughterbord for the wavetable connector (that's a must have with games with good midi music).
Back to top
kreats
Member
Member


Offline
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Fri May 27, 2005 6:38 am     Post subject: Reply with quote

I went for an amd 5x86 133 - dunno why, it just seemed like the best of the 486 cpus

Forget the mobo chipset - but I made sure it supported the WB caching in the AMD cpu

32Mb RAM - don't need any more and 64Mb counts too slowly

Matrox Millenium II 4Mb for nice picture quality (and VESA support) .. though I think the ET6100 is probably the best choice (for compatibility) if you can find one

Pure3d 3dfx card - using this for descent II atm

SCSI cdrom, though I'm considering going back to IDE as the drive I have spins a little loudly

SB16, GuS, Yamaha DB50XG

Dodgy ol 14" monitor - I think one of the nicer sony 15" is what I'm aiming for though

Moslo works ok if I need to slow it down.. works fairly well in most instances.
Back to top
dokzero5
Member
Member


Offline
Joined: 10 Apr 2005
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Fri May 27, 2005 6:43 am     Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm also a lucky owner of the DB50XG. Soundblaster 16 + DB50XG board = perfect. Together with the SuperWave32 probably the best midi you can get. Damn, Doom sounds soooo good with that card. Don't have a GUS though, probably should get one for those good ol' Scream/Fast tracker days, and always nice to have a little IRQ/DMA solving challenge :-)

W
Back to top
GameMaster.EXE
Way too much free time
Way too much free time


Offline
Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 694
Location: North Texas, USA

PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 11:59 am     Post subject: Reply with quote

IBM or Microsoft should release a special version of dos that is designed for gaming only. Maybe they would have if the 90's had lasted longer. The era of dos games seems to be coming to a close. I should have expected this from Microsoft. Leaving dos, their first creation, behind in the dirt and leading Windows on a rampage through the computer industry and Macintosh, out of breath, trying to catch up.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DOS Games Discussion Forum Index -> Hardware All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group and Ask an Expert
Also powered by Darren and the other admin and mods' hard work! ;)