| What's the best ratin' system? |
| 0-10 |
|
30% |
[ 7 ] |
| 1-5 (stars) |
|
8% |
[ 2 ] |
| 0-100 (%) |
|
56% |
[ 13 ] |
| F-A+ |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 23 |
|
| Author |
Message |
486 player Gaming Demi-god

 Joined: 18 Sep 2002 Posts: 1029
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 1:52 pm
Post subject: Best rating? |
|
|
| Should there be only one, or are current 2 ok? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Annorax Member

 Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Posts: 46 Location: Westfield, MA
|
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2003 12:45 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| I would say the 0-100%, since it's easy to use and very precise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johpower Way too much free time

 Joined: 06 Jan 2003 Posts: 424 Location: Colorado North 40
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:37 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
For overall, I like 0-5 stars (boy are there a few 0 star games.... )
But for the detailed examinations, 0-10 or percentile ratings are prefered, with appropriate editorial. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dogbreath Admin

 Joined: 14 Sep 2002 Posts: 3907 Location: In the back of a jacked-up Ford.
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 5:03 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| The problem here is 0 is the lowest score allowed... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Splodginator Way too much free time

 Joined: 23 Apr 2003 Posts: 560 Location: Nowhere.
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 6:33 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
I think stars are the best way to rate games, because you don't need to calculate too much, and its mostly an approximation. Although, when you wan't to use normal, symbolic stars for the ratings...
Last edited by Splodginator on Tue Jul 08, 2003 3:36 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dogbreath Admin

 Joined: 14 Sep 2002 Posts: 3907 Location: In the back of a jacked-up Ford.
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 7:02 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
IT WAS ARD! I GAB IT 5 TARS!!!!
     |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Da_Goat Moderator

 Joined: 14 Sep 2002 Posts: 2042 Location: Prescott, Arizona, USA, Earth, The Milky Way, The Universe, Nothing and Nowhere.
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 8:09 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| 1.0, 1.1...-...9.9, 10.0 is the best, in my opinion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wally*Won_Kenobie i r teh pwnage
 Joined: 01 May 2003 Posts: 3679 Location: Australia, earth, Milky way
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2003 10:37 pm
Post subject: stars |
|
|
stars is the best system. you can count the stars in halves or quaters so yeah
.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dogbreath Admin

 Joined: 14 Sep 2002 Posts: 3907 Location: In the back of a jacked-up Ford.
|
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2003 2:29 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm... that was a 3-star reply.
   |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wally*Won_Kenobie i r teh pwnage
 Joined: 01 May 2003 Posts: 3679 Location: Australia, earth, Milky way
|
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2003 9:11 pm
Post subject: LOL |
|
|
YAY!!!!!
3 stars is ok but i would rather about 4 stars |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 9:32 am
Post subject: |
|
|
| 0-10 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Unknown Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2004 7:47 am
Post subject: |
|
|
Guess this poll is over so let me add a new topic to it
A banning streak is apon us look out all
because you could be NEXT! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cramhains Expert

 Joined: 09 Jan 2005 Posts: 119 Location: Uranus
|
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 9:07 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| Dogbreath wrote: | Hmmm... that was a 3-star reply.
   |
That is very funny I'll give a 5 star.
     |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dark Lord Experienced Member

 Joined: 19 Feb 2005 Posts: 68
|
Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 9:06 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| I'd say the best is 0-100 because it offers a wider range so you don't have to type 8.94174967396 to prove how exact you think it is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|